Sunday, 19 January 2020

Megxit and Brexit is the strongest impetus for the Australian Republican Movement's primary objective, Republicanism. By Tim Brian Tufuga

Brexit will occur on January 31, 2020, and with this momentous event the more than forty five years since the United Kingdom had been forced into joining the European Economic Community (EEC) will end.

With this significant political event, the British people will no longer be subjected to the whimsical demands by the European egalitarian fraternity and their commitment to EU membership obligations and unshackling of a European Yoke, as it were, for the proud Pompous Englishman.

In the meantime, Brexit has become a Murphy’s Law fate for the British Royal Family, in that though the British may have redeemed some of their former Imperial graces and aloofness amongst their European equals, it appears to me, that the British royal family are even too good for miscegenation with the, presumably, lesser races amongst their Commonwealth of Nations brood.

The British Empire was after all forged from the Colonial expansion of the Englishman to the corners of the globe and Colonising the multicultural members into the Commonwealth of Nations Clique. An exclusive membership excluding European Nations and yes, indeed, EUROPEANS. Obviously, then, the European ethnicity populations from the Commonwealth of Nations membership, are from the outcome of European settlement within these, hitherto, multicultural and multiracial amalgam that is the Commonwealth of Nations membership.

Miscegenation with the encounters between cultures and races would obviously be an unavoidable outcome with the encounter of cultures, races and experiences. The former HRH, and Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle, is a salient case in point.It appears that the hybridisation of races has been considered repugnant and repulsive by even the Duchess’s own subjects from the Dukedom of Sussex, whom it has been alleged that she had been subjected to social media racial slurs and innuendo, a very encouraging impetus for the Duchess to want to leave her house and home quick smart.

Thankfully, with the abdication of the Dukedom by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, the aggrieved parties have reached an amicable outcome. A divorce from the British Royal Family by the former Duke and Duchess of Sussex and with this momentous event, the surrender of their royal titles and Anglophile airs and graces.

The timing of this divorce from the British Royal Family by the former Duke and Duchess of Sussex has coincided with the United Kingdom’s divorce from the European Union. The ramifications from these major events in British history may in fact hasten the path towards Republicanism within Canada, Australia and New Zealand not because of Brexit per se, but, moreso by the cultural and racial impact by Megxit, which is considered more devastating for the British Royalty due to what appears to be an expulsion of a miscegenation royal marriage along with royal titles of the former HRH and Dukedom of this miscegenation royal marriage which has been viewed by the multicultural world as devastatingly repulsively racist.

The image cast upon the Commonwealth of Nations members is one in which Royal Miscegenation marriages is to be frowned upon by the British Royalty, and it is considered unacceptable, by the social graces of the British Epicurean Aristocracy, with the outcome for a Recalcitrant HRH Prince, an ignominious fall from grace, along with his royal titles, to the commonplace of the common citizenry likened to the fate of the late King Edward VIII and Mrs Simpson. And, yet, worse still for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, is the racist overtones associated with the expulsion of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex from their Dukedom and from the United Kingdom to Canada.

From the Commonwealth of Nations perspective, the fate of the Sussex Dukedom has cast a shadow of royal institutionalised racism throughout the Commonwealth. With this ignominious Megxit from Britain the world can only see this as the unacceptability of Royal miscegenation marriages by the British people, particularly by the Dukedom of Sussex, and moreover, by the British Royal family.

Miscegenation may be the mea culpa for Megxit, the ramifications for the former British Empire, through the Commonwealth of Nations, may be more pervasive than one may realise. Since, the Meghan Markle Cinderella example to the world was significantly more than a Cinderella story of Common Girl who found her Prince, it was a Girl from a mixed race background whom had been swept off her feet by an English Prince. The romantic tale, as in reality, does not have a happy ending and the Megxit has exemplified in this instance.

The lesson from a Multicultural and more importantly from a multiracial perspective, at least according to non-Anglo-Celtic and European perspective, is that according to the English Aristocracy and the British Royalty, miscegenation is to be frowned upon and discouraged most certainly. The outcome from this lesson is the interpretive exile of an English Prince, stripped of all his Royal titles and reduced to commonplace obscurity as punishment for his recalcitrancy. As for the former HRH Duchess of Sussex, she remains in her station inherited station in society, a mere third estate commoner, as it were.

The British Cringe and the anti-Monarchy impetus becomes more expansive with the non-Anglo-Saxon and European ethnic groups, especially throughout the Commonwealth of Nations member nations, have viewed this brazen and dastardly salient act of overt royal institutionalised racism, and have become repulsed by this British Royalty and British institutionalised racial purity institutionalism overtones by the British establishment which would hasten the path towards the demise of the British Empire.

The Australian Republican Movement have latched onto this new royal institutionalised racism act as hinging upon the Royal Family objective of maintaining a racial purity of the British European aristocracy from the purported impurity from miscegenation. Since most of the former British Empire are non-European in their multiracial and multicultural aggregations, the British Empire and therefore, the Commonwealth of Nations, is doomed.

Added to the woes of the British cultural identity is Brexit, which has distanced the British from their European membership and leaving the British alone in the world with only their precious Commonwealth of Nations as the Legacy of the once proud British Raj, separating the British from the rest of Europe. This separation has become much more lonely for the British with Megxit, and the racialist overtones with this departure from England by the former Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

The end game, it is hope for the proponents vying to have Britain return to the European Union fold, with the outcome of Megxit and the backlash from the racism backlash from throughout the Commonwealth of Nations and North America, particularly from the Black Lives Matter circles, the Eurocentrism will compel the British to want to return back into the EU Fold.

Unfortunately, for the British, any reversal of decision to return to the EU, would entail a humbling experience that would reduce the British to humble compliance to their European Masters, for certainly, the Germans and the French would revel in the thought of the British returning with their wounded pride and realising that seventy five years after World War Two, it was not an Anglo-American victory on Victory Europe Day, VE Day on the 8th of May 1945, when Brexit fails in the long run, it was really Germany, and their economic dominance of the European Union, who would have the last laugh against the British and Anglo-American VE Day celebrations. Such is the significance of the Megxit lesson and the Brexit reversal as is anticipated by the Europeans in the near future.

Tim Brian Tufuga



Saturday, 11 January 2020

2020 A year of Brinkmanship. By Tim Brian Tufuga

By the end of 2019, the US 82nd Airbourne were being mobilised and were heading to Iraq in what appears to be US-Iran Brinkmanship.

The thirteenth anniversary of the execution of the Bathist Sunni Leader of Iraq was commemorated with the attack on the US Embassy by a predominantly a Sunni motley crew of Protestors. The attack was a culmination of weeks of domestic protestations against a Shia dominated Iraqi Government which has illustrated the power vacuum within the Sunni dominated regions within Iraq Governorates forcing many disaffected unemployed and disaffected Iraqi citizens to march en masse to the Iraqi capital City to stage protests and civil unrest.
(Biography.com)

The world had long forgotten the regime change and the commemoration of the execution of the former Sunni Strongman and the skewiff Sectarian power shift from the 36% Sunni Iraqi population from the 60% or so Shia Iraqi population. The Bathist Regime was Sunni and were obviously politically unpopular in Shia dominated Governorate regions of Iraq. (NYTimes)

When the Sunni Bathist regime was overthrown during Operation Iraqi freedom, the regime that replaced the Sunni was naturally a Iraqi Shia regime, which then dominated the Central Government, and were merely the puppetry from the Shia theocracy of Iran. With the present economic woes suffered mostly by the disaffected and disenfranchised Sunni Iraqi population punished and excluded by the present regime, the domestic woes spilt over into violent street protest, culminating in the US Embassy incursion, followed by the assassination of the Iranian Quds Special Forces Commander, (Shia Commander if you will), you have yourself a cassus belli for Iranian retaliatory missile strikes against American troops embedded in Iraq.

The likelihood of a Shia world confrontation seems very likely but unlike Op. Iraqi Freedom, the terms of engagement will be very different.


(Wikipedia.com)


Iran has a formidable military presence, their terrain is very rugged similar to the Tora Bora Mountains of Afghanistan and are not flat and expansive as Iraq or Southern Afghanistan, so the field of combat will be very difficult to fight, so the aerial bombardments will be almost ineffectual. Ground mobilisation will have to be very significant to make inroads within the rugged terrain and will be an arduous task for even the most hardiest of Armies, including a Superpower like America.

The Shia world, unlike the Sunni who would include the Al Qaeda Network and the Islamic State, are less expansive than the AQ and the IS Sunni Terrorist Organisations, but, they are not less formidable, the Hezbollah, is the most notorious of the Shia Terrorist organisation which are highly active in their Israeli incursions and terrorism activities.

(Reddit.com)

Like the AQ and the IS, the Hezbollah network is global and will engage the West in equal vigour as the AQ and the IS of the Sunni world. In this context, the Iranian conflict will most likely signal an additional dimension in the global jihad between the Judeo-Christian, Judaism and the Secularist West, engaged in a Jihad against the combined Sunni and Shia Muslim world. The conflict will be through proxies, ie Hezbollah, and the conflict nature will be asymmetrical violence in non-combat zones in soft targets, like churches, education institutions, shopping centres, public transport hubs and in the heart of communities in non-combat zones. An ominous warning for all since the war zone is not in Iran or even in Iraq it will be at a church a Walmart, a local supermarket, a train station or a shopping Mall, the war zone will be within your own community.

Tim B Tufuga